Reposted from: DjSandu.com
Forget The Old Heliocentric Model – Our Solar System is a Vortex!
The old Newtonion/Copernican Heliocentric model of our solar system is an unproven theory. A bright fellow named Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat came up with quite a different way to think of our Solar System.
There are a couple of reasons why I think this model could just be right. First of all, the heliocentrical model has always been presented (especially by NASA) as a “frisbee” model.
[image taken from here]
Think about this for a minute. In this diagram it seems the Solar System travel to the left. When the Earth is also traveling to the left (for half a year) it must go faster than the Sun. Then in the second half of the year, it travels in a “relative opposite direction” so it must go slower than the Sun. Then, after completing one orbit, it must increase speed to overtake the Sun in half a year. And this would go for all the planets. Just like any point you draw on a frisbee will not have a constant speed, neither will any planet.
Secondly, most planets are visible throughout the entire year. In a “flat” model, every single planet would hide behind the Sun at least once a year. They don’t. Now the heliocentric model isn’t entirely flat, but mostly.
IF the travel direction of the Solar System is “up” or “down” – why haven’t I heard from this in my entire life? Why do I need to run into the dr Bhat material to see the “spiral” for the first time? The opposition is divided into two groups: one group thinks the helical model is wrong, the other group says that there’s no or little difference with the current model – very curious.
UPDATE: the FIRST NASA image that shows it like it is
Finally I found ONE image from NASA that shows the angle and travel direction of our solar system:
Fact of the matter is that if the helical model is correct and our Solar System is a traveling vortex, it will change how we feel about our journey. For me personally the heliocentric model feels like a useless marry-go-round: after one year we are back to square one. The helical model feels much more like progress, growth, a journey through space in which we never ever come back to our starting point. We are NOT in a big marry-go-round. We are on a journey.
A circle is a spiral with the progress taken out
And then I get very suspicious because this kind of tricks have been used before.
Compare the Mayan calendar with the Gregorian one: the Mayan calendar has an intricate system to guide you in your personal spiritual evolution and growth. It has days for making new friends, days for self-reflection, and so on. If you were to live by this calendar, you would never stop moving forwards.
The Gregorian calendar on the other hand tells you only a few things: your week starts at Monday, you’re free on Saturday and Sunday, and you work till you drop dead. Very handy if you’re part of the establishment, not very useful if you’re an individual looking for ways to better yourself.
The Helical Model of Solar System and Alexander Sitchen
Reposted from: AMERICAN KABUKI
Gnawing on universe in the Bhat cave.. to the edge of the solar system and beyond…. Some interesting conclusions that naturally spring from the Helical motion model versus the heliocentric model of the solar system and beyond.
For one thing the model clearly explains why none of our NASA launched space ships have ever, nor will ever leave our solar system. Since the sun is in effect dragging us all along behind it at super fantastic speeds greater than we can effectively measure, it therefore makes perfect sense why Nasa’s Voyager space machines have not yet left the solar system.
Our solar system is more of a cometary body surrounded by a coma of vast size than a stationary sun being orbited lazily by planets. Therefore the energy required to leave our solar system will of necessity be greater than the speed of the sun through interstellar space. Thus the ‘escape velocity’ of our or any other solar system will be the ‘drag’ effected by the sum of the total of the mass in the solar system multiplied by its speed and its rotation.
The above, now of course puts serious doubt to ANY interstellar travel in the conventional sense. Further, it means that Sitchen’s 3600 year ‘orbiting’ Nibiru or Planet X cannot be ‘on the other side of the sun’, nor for that matter can any other body in our solar system. If such a body were to exist, it must therefore be within the coma of the sun, and again, thus constantly visible from earth….therefore Sitchen’s understanding, as well as his transliteration are flawed. If not deliberate disinformation.
Read more here: http://halfpasthuman.com/bhatcave.html