Deus Nexus / New World Order

Is a One World Government Inevitable?


Emblem from Star Trek’s parallel universe episode “Mirror, Mirror”

by David Nova | from Deus Nexus

In the article Moving Toward A One World Government, A One World Economy And A One World Religion, Michael Snyder passionately warns us that we are moving towards a global, geopolitical New World Order, that we will find ourselves in a global government, with a global currency, under a global religion. The mechanisms are already in place. All we have to do is sit back and let it happen.

However, in his latest post, Benjamin Fulford doesn’t seem to think an international (non-Khazarian) NWO is such a terrible thing. He claims that a World government is inevitable but it must never be fascist. That’s quite optimistic, (what happened to the multi-polar world?) but then I thought that we had already established by now that a one world government doesn’t have to be fascist to be ruthless, oppressive, or even diabolical. Just clever and deceitful. (My related post on the subject: The Two Dystopian Archetypes: Chaos and Order)

The political events of the past several years are pointing inexorably towards the formation of some sort of world government. This was made even more clear as most world leaders gathered at the United Nations for the September 28th Tetrad blood moon 70th UN anniversary appeared to be, with a few quibbles, mostly reading from the same script. There is now a consensus among world leaders that world government is the only way to prevent corporate crime syndicates from murdering and plundering this planet into destruction. The battle now is over what sort of government that will be. – Benjamin Fulford

With the end of World War II, our world had supposedly, and quite theatrically, defeated fascism, and yet we were left with two very dysfunctional models of competing governance that created a bi-polar world of nuclear proliferation – communism and capitalism. Neither model was overtly fascist, and yet there were ruthless and oppressive elements to both systems. They both manipulated and raped third-world nations, using them as pawns in a duality game of global conquest. How soon we forget.


“Not that I condone fascism, or any -ism for that matter. -Ism’s in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself.” – Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)

What are some of the new -isms we are likely to get from this new world government?  Globalism (more surveillance and a war against global warming), Communitarianism (a new caste system), Universalism 0r a new global Monotheism (all-seeing-eye on top of the pyramid), and of course Transhumanism.

HYDRAAs the new history goes, the undead Nazi Hydra (See Captain America Gives The Illuminati Game Away) infiltrated the Anglo-Zionist western world and took over like a parasite. However, the Soviets recruited and absorbed just as many Nazi scientists into their ranks as the U.S. did after the war. America even recruited them with the help of the Vatican. Of course, we don’t hear too much about the Nazi scientists the Soviet Union absorbed. They vanished behind the Iron Curtain. But we do know that the Soviets were as active as their American intelligence counterparts in researching mind control and psychic phenomenon. After the fall of the Soviet Union, reports have since leaked out.

Surviving the threat of nuclear war, what has the Cold War morphed into? An East-West duality rerun of World War II, with brand new players representing the Nazi Axis and the Allied Powers. Haven’t we been down this war-torn road before? Haven’t we seen how this epic play ends? It gave us the United Nations, the IMF, the World Bank, as well as the national security state – bastions of global awakening and universal prosperity. (Yes, this is sarcasm, Sheldon.)

Since when exactly, in the entire history of humanity, has any war left us with something truly better? War never provides resolution. It never results in happy ever after. War is merely the transfer of negative energy into a shiny new product to sell to the masses. “Hey folks, we’re winners! Don’t we feel good about ourselves after all that unnecessary death and destruciton!”

Despite what we see in the media, World War III has been quietly unrolling for several years now, notably in the Ukraine, now in Syria. The Pope officially announced it. (Pope Francis Warns That World War III Has Started) Few people paid any attention. They were too busy watching the Zombie apocalypse on The Walking Dead

This is not the same trenches and tanks World War of our great-grandfathers. This is a new fangled World War of economic subterfuge, cyber warfare, drones attacks, and weaponized weather-modification. It’s a stealth World War. The elite controlled media has managed to plung the masses into such a stupefied slumber that World War is no longer a ratings grabber. Or maybe the world is actually filling up with more light. Or maybe the elites have just smartened up – they can now conduct their profitable World Wars without destroying entire European nations in the process, using mercenary armies of CIA sponsored radicals as cannon fodder.  It’s all very stage-managed. Bravo! It’s also completely transparent to anyone paying attention in the aisle seats. But it’s still theatre of the absurd and the hypnosis of the gullible in the front row.

I find it interesting that the international mainstream media, when covering international politics these days, are now throwing around the term “New World Order” as if it has become the officially sanctioned, culturally accepted term for describing the inevitable future of our geopolitical landscape. All negative aspects of a conspiratorial nature have been scrubbed clean since George H. Bush used the term in an address to congress. Note the date of the speech. Exactly 11 years to the day… before 9/11.

“Out of these troubled times, our…objective – a New World Order – can emerge… Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known…”
– Former President George Bush, September 11, 1990 –Wikipedia

However, it was a Soviet who used the term before Bush.

But the principal statement creating the new world order concept came from Mikhail Gorbachev’s December 7, 1988 speech to the United Nations General Assembly. His formulation included an extensive list of ideas in creating a new order. He advocated strengthening the central role of the United Nations, and the active involvement of all members—the Cold War had prevented the UN and its Security Council from performing their roles as initially envisioned. –Wikipedia

And then…

“For a new type of progress throughout the world to become a reality, everyone must change. Tolerance is the alpha and omega of a new world order.” – Gorbachev, June 1990 –Wikipedia


So the Americans don’t exactly have a copyright on the term New World Order. Obviously, it’s been whispered about for decades in the back rooms where the rich and powerful meet. This old ritual phrase is now safe for public consumption. It’s been on the back of the one dollar bill for close to a century, right under the pyramid with the floating capstone and the all-seeing-eye of Sauron. Pull out your wallet and take a look. “Novus Ordo Seclorum”

The phrase Novus ordo seclorum is Latin for “New order of the ages” appears on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, first designed in 1782 and printed on the back of the United States one-dollar bill since 1935.

The word”secular” is very close in origin.

Secular and secularity derive from the Latin word saecularis meaning “of a generation, belonging to an age”. The Christian doctrine that God exists outside time led medieval Western culture to use secular to indicate separation from specifically religious affairs and involvement in temporal ones.

Deus Nexus is latin too. It roughly translates as “God Interconnection,” meaning we are all entangled aspects of God in this universe. Which latin phrase would you rather have on your dollar bill? (Yes Sheldon, it’s sarcasm. I don’t want to design your new dollar bill.)

The Nazionists are still pushing for a totalitarian, fascist new world order controlled by the same old bloodlines. The White Dragon Society and its allies are insisting that it be more like a benevolent council of village elders. The illuminati, the Pentagon and the Italian P2 lodge are, for their part, offering a third alternative, which they call a Star Trek future. This vision is of a world headed by a large meritocratic organization run something along the lines of the Pentagon, the Vatican or the Chinese Communist Government.  – Benjamin Fulford

Because when I think of a Star Trek future, I immediately jump to a comparison with the Pentagon, the Vatican, or the Chinese Communist Government. Yikes! That’s just insulting. Has Fulford ever watched Star Trek?

All of Captain Kirk’s egregious transgressions of the Prime Directive aside, can you really picture Gene Roddenberry’s United Federation of Planets run like the Pentagon, the Vatican, or the Chinese Communist Government? Not unless Star Trek’s Federation has secret black budgets, tolerates generational sexual abuse, has a horrible human rights record, and is responsible for unrestrained pollution of the planet.  These are not the hallmarks of a Star Trek future…


Star Trek episode “Mirror, Mirror”

Maybe Mr. Fulford is talking about “Mirror, Mirror”, you know, that episode where Captain Kirk and his landing party have a transporter malfunction and end up in a parallel dark universe where Mr. Spock has a goatee and the Federation is a bunch of interstellar sadists and sociopaths. They make the Klingons look downright adorable.

Here’s a short list of some of the wonderful things that are likely to continue or improve under a one world government:

  • Weather modification, chemtrails, a manufactured global warming crisis
  • Genetically modified foods (probably from a different corporation than Monsanto)
  • Questionable vaccinations, nano-technology, microchipping
  • Universal surveillance, universal data collection, watch lists, Minority Report profiling
  • Educational indoctrination, brain mapping, human genetic manipulation, mind control
  • Life extension tech for the wealthy, societal programming, a welfare caste system

Those who argue against a world government are either naïve or else work for corporate handlers who wish to have the right to continue to plunder the planet without such impediments as human rights, the protection of nature or the rule of law.  – Benjamin Fulford

Thanks Ben, but I don’t have a corporate handler or a corporate handout. This blog is 100% me. And I’m certainly not naive. Still, Mr. Fulford is correct. We will undoubtably have a world government in the very near future. It seems almost unavoidable at this point. We The People, the 99%, are just not mature enough, together enough, motivated enough, determined enough, or organized enough to rule over ourselves or stop the globalized train that is coming down the tracks that the elites have laid. But that doesn’t mean that we can’t change the tracks the train is running on.

I am comforted by the knowledge of how the Light operates. The Light always works from within, working inside-out. Whereas the darkness works outside-in, manipulating change in our external reality. A dark totalitarianism may be what the darkness ultimately wants. But if a New World Order can only materialize into our world as a bright new chapter for humanity, as a wolf in sheep’s clothing, pretending to champion a humanitarian agenda, then they are playing in the arena of the Light. They are giving the Light a home team advantage. It is our job to demand and manifest real change, not be satisfied with a corrupt imitation, but turn an empty promise into a better reality. We have the power to transform the world from the inside-out, by changing ourselves, by overcoming our own darkness, our own fear and selfishness. Light transforms darkness simply by filling it with more light. The release of free energy technology may hold the key to shifting our psychological paradigm of scarcity and competition to one of abundance and sharing, creating unlimited Light. (Related Post: Understanding Our Divine Relationship)

We can transform a New World Order into a Brand New World simply by transforming ourselves, by standing up for our belief in ourselves and what we passionately want. We have to take back our future, perhaps even transform it into the Star Trek future that we desire and deserve. But that requires a great deal of maturity. The technology is already out there. When we are ready for it, when we are ready to accept the responsibility, that future will materialize.

In conclusion, I just want to repeat this quote, because it’s wonderfully nostalgic, because I love it, and because it sums up the human problem nicely. Pay attention this time…

“Not that I condone fascism, or any -ism for that matter. -Ism’s in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself.” – Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)

About the Author

David Nova is the author of the metaphysical fiction series “Season of the Serpent.”  He is a truth-seeker, a Wanderer, a blogger, and the moderator of Deus Nexus: Messages For An Entangled Universe.  For additional information about the author or his novels, visit his website, or his Facebook page.

This article is offered under Creative Commons license. It’s okay to republish it anywhere as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.


4 thoughts on “Is a One World Government Inevitable?

  1. >>Those who argue against a world government are either naïve or else work for corporate handlers who wish to have the right to continue to plunder the planet without such impediments as human rights, the protection of nature or the rule of law.<<

    OMG, Fullford's quote is the "guilt by association as an ad hominem logical fallacy", meaning, he's appealing to the tendency of people to avoid wanting to feel guilty, aka, if you do not believe in a One World government, you should feel guilty, because only naive people (and you don't want to feel naive, do you?) and corporate shills (you don't want to feel like the horrible corporate syndicates, do you?) are against a One World government.

    Great article too, btw, I really enjoyed it, it points out a lot of the flaws of these manufactured jokers. 😉 Your solution is exactly what we need as well, a bunch of individuals transforming themselves, through going within. Thanks David!

  2. A very relevant post relating to some of my personal frustration on what is exactly the meaning of knowing any truth. From my perspective, as a 25 year old with some inner urging to act in a meaningful way, while maintaining a balanced perspective in the light of truth, I am having difficulty finding an uncorrupted path of action. I see the freedom movement, which has individuals that seem to be good sources of information, especially about the self and Self, but it also has a large incoherent base of controlled opposition. As I try and articulate my thoughts of truth about Natural Law, mostly in practice of developing my wisdom portion of the Trivium, to persuade academic individuals positioned in the realm of “necessary authority and control of the animalistic freedom” position of politics, economics, population control, police and other related topics, I struggle with doubts regarding a humanly truthful potentiality prevailing to lend wind to our sails.

    It seems to me that if the numerical average of individuated consciousness remains below the threshold of truthful understanding to act on true moral feelings, employing honest triune intelligence to choose paths of action which are not based from fear, then the quantum requisit will continue to hinder humanity from realizing a world some see in their imagination. This obstacle is quite disheartening.

    I have a feeling that urges me to refrain from focusing only upon my own personal development, but I also feel caution against a concerted effort to change individuals. Perhaps a solution is to just continue my exploration within and without and to allow the world to flow, taking and giving patterns from one to the other. It just seems so difficult to watch the world at times. I am also looking into the organized efforts to aid the “lowly victims” of the symptoms a world borne by fear. I have doubts as to the macro effect of such work, but it should at least provide some new perspectives. The trouble with truth is that it seems to make inert the value of pursuing a career in much of a society that is content to ignore suffering within and without, as long as you can get your Starbucks and know that 5% goes to some poor soul and you did your part to help end suffering for the day. On the other end, there are polarized individuals fervently championing some cause to change this or that, all the while missing the mark because the point of origin in thought was misplaced.

    To end on a better note, we at least know that there is light. We aren’t totally lost to fear. Just struggling to comprehend contemplation. And I couldn’t ask for a day more beautiful or a sky so clear, than what has been in reality and is in our imagining.

    • “It just seems so difficult to watch the world at times.” – Yes, I think that is probably the hardest part for those who are awake and feeling alive. We often forget that it’s not an easy thing to change the world. The world has been this way for a very long time, and sleeping souls don’t want to change. Yet we seem to feel the significance of this particular time in history as a turning point. We have come into this world for a purpose. We feel it. If only we knew exactly what that purpose was.

      This is ultimately a game our souls are playing, being on this material stage for a limited time. Eventually, we will take this limited experience back to eternity, to the other side. Are we more enlightened on the other side of eternity, able to see the whole problem from a different perspective, to know what new solutions to bring back? I would hope so. Is it more important, from the perspective of eternity, to change ourselves than to change the temporal world? Probably. Should we stop seeking to change the world? No. We want to bring the divine fully into the material. That is our shared dream. It wont happen overnight, as much as we wish that it could. From the perspective of Eternity, however, 100 years is the blink of an eye. So we should never lose hope.

      So we do what we can, the transformation that we can bring our own passion to. So many people are starting to see all of this information and ponder the question, “What can I do about it?” The answer is simple, be like this hummingbird.

      Thanks for sharing your wonderful thoughts!

Comments are closed.